How Bank Guarantee Letter Could Help Secure a Transaction and Risks Involved?

  

In the process of performing civil transactions, there is a need to bind the performance of obligations of the parties hence secured transaction is needed and guarantee is one of the commonly used methods to secure the performance of obligations in business and commercial activities. The party that provides guarantee is normally a commercial bank and bank guarantee is normally a loan service. In reality, there are potentially many risks involved in the guarantee transaction through issuing of bank guarantee letter which needs the attention of dispute lawyers in banking and finance to provide legal advice throughout the process.

Bank guarantee or guarantee commitment is a document issued by the guarantor or counter-guarantee or the guarantee-confirming party in the form of a Letter of Guarantee or a Guarantee Contract. Thus, a letter of bank guarantee is understood as a written commitment of the bank to the guarantee recipient that the bank will perform financial obligations on behalf of the guaranteed party when the guaranteed party fails to perform or not fulfilling the obligations committed to the guarantee recipient. In case the parties choose the form of counter-guarantee or guarantee confirmation, the letter of guarantee shall include the written commitment of the counter-guarantee issuing party to the guarantee, or of the guarantee-confirmation issuing party to the obligee.

When a guarantee obligation arises, the obligee must send a written request for the performance of the guarantee obligation, enclosed with the documents agreed upon in the guarantee commitment, to the guarantee-executing bank. The request for performance of guarantee obligations is considered valid when the bank receives it within the working time of the bank and within the valid guarantee commitment period. In case the request for performance of the guarantee obligation is sent in the form of a registered letter via the public postal network, the date the guarantor receives the request is the date of signing and receiving the registered letter.

Within 5 working days from the date the guarantor bank receives a valid written request for performance of the guarantee obligation, the guarantor shall be responsible for properly and fully performing the promised guarantee obligation for the with the guarantor. In case the guarantor bank refuses to perform the guarantee obligation, within 5 working days after receiving the request to perform the guarantee obligation, the bank must reply in writing clearly stating the reason for the refusal. In case of payment in foreign currency, credit institutions, foreign bank branches shall debit that foreign-currency sum to the mandatory lending account.

Credit institutions, or foreign bank branches, shall agree on the guarantee-issuing fee amount paid to customers. In case of a counter guarantee or guarantee confirmation, the guarantee-issuing fee amount shall be agreed upon by parties on the basis of the guarantee-issuing fee amount approved by the obligor. If the guarantee currency is foreign one, parties shall agree on collecting the guarantee-issuing fee by accepting that foreign currency or converting that foreign currency into Vietnam at the sell rate defined on the fee collection or fee collection notification date.

Disputes could arise from many situations, for example, there is a case of issuing a false letter of guarantee because an individual in the bank violates the law, or the bank officer signs a letter of guarantee without proper authorization from the legal representative of the bank, or letter of guarantee is in violation of form according to the regulation of state bank. In addition, if a conditional letter of bank guarantee is applicable, a dispute may arise from an understanding of whether or not the conditions for the guarantee have been met. In many cases, there might need to be a lawsuit to determine the conditions fulfilment of the guarantee and such might be lengthy and costly. Therefore, the parties involved in the guarantee transaction might need to consult a lawyer with expertise in banking disputes to check the legitimacy and validity of the letter of bank guarantee and the possibility to be guaranteed when the conditions are met.

ANT Lawyers – As a law firm in Vietnam will always follow up with authorities for legal update on matters relevant to banking and finance to update clients on regular basis.

Readmore:https://antlawyers.vn/library/how-bank-guarantee-letter-could-help-secure-a-transaction-and-risks-involved.html

Read More

How to Distinguish between Deposit and Advance Payment?

    

In commercial transactions, it is very common for one party to give the other party an amount of money before the contract being performed.

Should this amount be considered as deposit or advance payment?

Deposit is one of security measures for the performance of contract obligations. According to regulation of Civil Code 2015, deposit is an act whereby one party (hereinafter referred to as the depositor) gives to other party (hereinafter referred to as the depositary) a sum of money or precious metals, gemstones or other valuable things (hereinafter referred to as the deposited property) for a period of time as security for the entering into or performance of a contract.

Upon a contract being entered into or performed, any deposited property shall be returned to the depositor, or deducted from the amount of payment obligation. If the depositor refuses to enter into or perform the contract, the deposited property shall belong to the depositary. In case the depositary refuses to enter into or perform the contract, the depositary must return the deposited property and pay an amount equivalent to the value of the deposited property to the depositor, unless otherwise agreed.

It can be seen that the purpose of deposit is to ensure the entering into or performance of a contract. Due to the fact that its nature is a security measure for the performance of contract obligations, sanction is set in regulation of deposit in case one party refuses to perform the agreement.

In practice, the advance payment can be understood that the obligor pays the obligee a sum of money in advance and this amount is regarded as in-advance performance of a payment obligation. As the nature of the advance is not a security measure for the performance of contract obligations, there is no fine rising from the advance if one party refuses to perform the agreement. Further, when a contracting party gives to the other party a sum of money, which is not clearly identified by the parties as a deposit or an advance, such amount shall be considered an advance payment.

It is important to distinguish the difference between deposit and advance payment to avoid potential disputes in performance the contract or consult with dispute resolution lawyers at early stage of the dispute for proper actions.

Readmore:https://antlawyers.vn/library/how-to-distinguish-between-deposit-and-advance-payment.html

Read More

How Dispute Settlement Mechanism of ASEAN Work?

    

As economic cooperation has expanded, having an effective mechanism to resolve disputes arising between member countries has become an essential need. Therefore, since 1996, ASEAN has started drafting a Protocol on Dispute Settlement Mechanism, and this Protocol was signed by ASEAN Economic Ministers on November 20, 1996 in Manila (Philippines).

The dispute settlement mechanism of ASEAN is built on the spirit of negotiation and mediation. At any time, Member States which are parties to the dispute have the right to choose forms of mediation. These forms may begin or end at any time. Only when the procedure for mediation has ended, the complainant proceeded to bring the matter to the Senior Economic Officials Meeting of ASEAN (SEOM). While the dispute is in progress, if the parties to the dispute agree, mediation procedures will continue to apply.

If the consultation does not resolve the dispute within sixty (60) days of the receipt of the request, the matter will be referred to SEOM. SEOM will set up a panel or, if possible, refer the matter to the special rules and procedures team or additional for review. However, in specific cases, if deemed necessary, SEOM may decide to resolve the dispute amicably without having to appoint a panel.

SEOM will review the panel report during its discussion and give a decision to the dispute within thirty (30) days from the date the panel submitted the report. In exceptional cases, SEOM may have an additional ten (10) days in adjudicating a dispute. SEOM representatives of Member States who are parties to the dispute may be present during the discussion but may not participate in judgments of SEOM. SEOM will adjudge on a majority basis.

Member States that are parties to the dispute may appeal the judgments of SEOM to the ASEAN Economic Ministers (“AEM”) within thirty (30) days. AEM must make a decision within thirty (30) days of the appeal. In exceptional cases, AEM may have an additional ten (10) days to make a decision on dispute resolution.

Readmore:https://antlawyers.vn/library/how-dispute-settlement-mechanism-of-asean-work.html

Read More